
HSBC are widely expected to follow the likes of Lloyds, RBS and Barclays by adding to their ever increasing PPI compensation fund. The banks in general seem to be under-estimating the costs of the biggest financial scandal ever to hit the shores of the UK, almost on a quarterly basis. With the total bill now above £23 billion it’s clear that the banks have some way to go before they can finally lay this ghost to rest.
HSBC PPI bill is expected to be increased by a further £75 million, which although is much less than the likes of RBS/Natwest, Lloyds and Barclays recent additions, still takes the HSBC PPI bill over £2.2 billion.
With profits falling all does not appear to be well inside the walls of one of the UK’s biggest banks, which also owns First Direct and HFC.
It’s thought the bank is looking towards the asian market in an attempt to make up the short-falls and money set aside for such scandals in the UK and US.
Investors will undoubtedly be looking for progress from the bank in the second quarter but if you think that you may be owed money from being mis-sold PPI by HSBC, why not start your claim today and contribute to another decline in profits for the bank.
Banks continue to rely upon people who may have a valid claim not coming forward. We’ve estimated 7 million UK customers have yet to make a PPI claim, with one of the main reasons being that they are unaware they’ve been sold PPI in the first instance. Due to the obscene profits generated by banks when selling PPI, huge bonus incentives were offered to staff for selling the product. This inevitably led to illegal practises and tactics in adding PPI to loans, mortgages, credit cards, store cards and hire purchase agreements, including adding PPI without the knowledge of the customer.
Your Money Claim can carry out the checks using their fast track system, and Your Money Claim is used to beating the banks on a daily basis. So why not see if Your Money Claim can assist you.
...

The next cock-up coming from the City is the mis-selling of packaged bank accounts. Some customers may even have packaged bank accounts without even really knowing whether they’re suitable, or indeed if they carry any benefits.
If you pay a monthly fee for your bank account in return for various bundled insurance policies, you have a packaged bank account. These accounts are sometimes referred to as ‘paid-for’ accounts. The insurance products vary and commonly include travel insurance, mobile phone insurance, breakdown cover and more.
Sometimes, the accounts come with other products or ‘perks’ such as preferential overdraft rates, or discounts of products and services from certain providers. Typically, packaged bank accounts cost between £5 and £30 per month.
For some people, these packaged accounts can be a useful way to access various insurance policies and keep them together neatly in one place. However, all too often customers are not made aware of the details and end up handing over money for something they don’t need and don’t want. The Financial Conduct Authority revealed bank staff have been incentivised to mis-sell packaged bank accounts to boost company profits.
As industry experts we’re confident packaged bank accounts will be the next big mis-selling scandal, and we’re equally confident we can win back the money that has been unfairly squeezed from unwitting consumers. If you have a useless packaged bank account, you’re part of a large club – it is estimated that 10 million people currently have a packaged bank account and the number keeps growing.
The Financial Ombudsman Service reported an increase in complaints from customers who did not know they had a packaged bank account and were unaware of how to access the ‘benefits’ for which they were paying. It is often not necessarily a case of whether or not a bank gave advice; it is a case of whether the advice was suitable and the customer was given enough information to make an informed decision independently.
Get in touch with experts. At Your Money Claim we have a proven track record when it comes to taking on the banks. We’re efficient and effective, and we’re passionate about results. Don’t take our word for it, take a look at our client testimonials! If you feel you’ve been made to pay for a packaged bank account we want to hear from you, get in touch via email, telephone or our live chat facility so we can begin to put things right for you.
...
Payment Protection Insurance, or PPI as it’s most commonly referred to, has been systematically mis-sold alongside various other products and has been a handsome earner for banks and lenders for decades as they swindled money from customers by taking advantage of their position of trust. For every ten complaints the Financial Ombudsman Service receives, eight are still regarding PPI and it estimates that £50 billion worth of PPI has been mis-sold throughout the years. Now the cat has been out of the bag for a while and the tables have turned somewhat, but far too many people still remain tentative about their chances of recovering compensation regarding mis-sold PPI and whether or not they’ve even had PPI. Unfortunately, it is still the case that some consumers aren’t entirely sure what PPI was sold with. So we’ve devised a quick list to give you a better idea.
One of the most commonly sold products which came along with mis-sold PPI was mortgages. Prior to the financial crash in 2008 credit seemed relatively easy to come by, and banks took advantage of the credit boom like never before. PPI was generating such huge profits that bonus incentives were offered to staff, which inevitably led to the mis-selling on an enormous scale. Lenders advised customers that PPI assisted in the application process, or even that the credit facility wasn’t avilable without PPI. In the case of millions of customers, PPI was added without the customer’s knowledge, hidden away in the small print. It was not a matter of choice, and many homeowners paid thousands, even tens of thousands, back to the bank for insurance they simply didn’t want, didn’t need, or sometimes didn’t even know they had. The same is true of loans. We estimate that if you’ve had credit prior to 2010 you may well be in a minority if you didn’t have PPI, such was the scale of the illegal practise.
As if the 30+% APR wasn’t enough, credit card providers and store card providers have been raking in a tidy amount extra as a result of mis-sold PPI. If you’ve shopped on credit, you could be entitled to reclaim PPI. Generally PPI was added each month you had a balance on your card, and would have been a percentage of your balance.
Today is the era of cars on finance. With people looking for the convenient option of monthly payments with all services and repairs included, many were snared by mis-sold PPI. Over the duration of a car’s finance plan, thousands of pounds could be charged in PPI costs.
Another way people have fallen foul of mis-sold PPI is through catalogue purchases made on credit. Entering into a catalogue agreement, many people were given PPI without consent. It is often the case that catalogues use different names and phrases when referring to their payment insurance, but it is always in essence PPI.
If you’ve entered into an agreement to pay for goods over a period of time, for example household appliances, there is every chance this came with PPI.
Your Money Claim are the experts. With decades of experience within the financial sector, Your Money Claim is used to beating the banks on a daily basis. Such is our status within the industry, the majority of the high street banks contacted us in order to set up fast-track systems whereby we can find out whether you’ve been sold PPI quick.
We’d be delighted to take care of your claim. As a regulated Claims Management Company you can be sure that your claim will be handled in the correct manner throughout the process. We’ll answer your questions and we’ll keep you informed at every step. So why not fill in our online form or contact us via telephone, email or via our live chat facility and we can make a start on potentially recovering thousands of pounds in compensation for you.
...
Lloyds Banking Group, which includes the likes of Lloyds, Halifax, Bank of Scotland and Black Horse to name a few, has today issued it’s most recent figures. The bank, part owned by the UK taxpayer following a rescue package by the government, has today revealed that the biggest financial scandal to hit the UK, the mis-selling of Payment Protection Insurance (PPI), is far from over.
You may recall that in Lloyds’ previous figures released to the city, it did not make any additions to it’s already staggering PPI compensation pot. This prompted analysts and so called experts to suggest this marked the beginning of the end of the PPI scandal. I suggested in my blog at the time that Lloyds were in the process of selling a 25% stake in TSB and that any bad news would affect the share price and therefore lead to losses for the bank.
I also suggested at the time that the Lloyds PPI bill will rise by over a billion over the course of the next 12 months. Three months later and they’ve added £600m to their compensation fund, so my prediction currently looks very much on course.
With RBS/Natwest and Barclays having already released their figures over the last week, with RBS adding £150m and Barclays topping up their compensation pot by £900m it’s clear that the scandal still has a long way to go before it’s over.
Unfortunately, whatever happens from now on, the banks will have profited more from selling PPI than they will ever pay back, given the compensation pot stands just over £23 billion, in contrast to the £50 billion worth of PPI policies sold. However, with an estimated 7 million people yet to make a claim, most of whom won’t be aware they’ve been sold a policy such were the tactics employed by lenders, I urge you to check your paperwork if you have it, or contact Your Money Claim who can carry out the necessary checks and work the claim on your behalf in order to recover the compensation you deserve.
...

Barclays bank has revealed that it is to add a further £900 million to its PPI compensation fund. This news from Barclays follows on from the announcement of half-year adjusted profits of £3.35 billion, a 7% decline on forecasts. This latest addition in PPI provisions takes the overall cost to Barclays’ of compensating PPI victims to £5 billion – barely scratching the surface of the money made selling insurance customers did not need.
The image of Barclays is still suffering in the eye of the consumer, especially after the firm’s bonus pay-outs were up 10% in 2013, regardless of the fact that both revenue and profits fell. On top of this, Barclays revealed it would be shedding 19,000 jobs worldwide – perhaps their priorities are slightly askew. In other news, Barclays is making a formal step away from the Bob Diamond era of big investment banking as evidenced by almost 50% decline in revenue in the investment arm of the organisation.
The increased fund for PPI claims comes after the tapering of numbers claiming PPI has not turned out to be as dramatic as expected by the banks. More PPI claims are being made from the years prior to 2005, a trend which has bankers rattled and likely to renew calls for a cut-off point for scammed customers to claim PPI. Barclays have this week followed the lead of Lloyds Banking Group, who added a further £500 million to their PPI compensation fund.
It’s great to see the banks are still putting money aside to be reclaimed by the innocent victims of bankers’ greed. If you were mis-sold PPI, your money is waiting for you. Millions of people are yet to claim PPI, and if you feel you may have a claim it is important to get in touch with a reputable Claims Management Company who can work through the process and win back what is rightfully yours. Your Money Claim have expertise and a proven track-record when it comes to beating the banks; why not get in touch via email, telephone or our live chat facility to see what they can do for you?
...
News emerged this week of the increased provisions put aside by banks to cover the PPI claims which are not dwindling as fast as they’d like. In particular, the banking industry is less than pleased at the acceleration in the number of claims which relate to PPI policies sold before 2005. The response to this trend has cost the banks an estimated £1.5 billion in topping up PPI compensation funds.
Taken at face value, one could be mistaken for overestimating the decline in PPI claims. The Financial Ombudsman Service said last week that it had received 57,000 PPI-related complaints in the second quarter of the year, in comparison with 132,000 in the period last year. However, while the overall trend is one of decline, the issue which is unsettling the chiefs in City banks is the steep increase in PPI claims from the pre-2005 era, and this has led to reasonable suspicions that lenders will kick up a fuss and make revived calls for the imposition of a cut-off point for those claiming PPI.
This is by no means a new move. Indeed, the banks took the issue to a judicial review in 2011, unsuccessfully arguing for 2005 to become the cut-off point. The fact that PPI claims from before 2005 are increasing, along with the substantial top-ups necessary to compensate PPI claimants, has rattled the major banks.
It is likely to be their argument that, as they are only obliged to keep customer records for seven years, they will not have the necessary essential information relating to PPI claims from so far back. Executives at big lenders will also cite the costs of administering ‘invalid’ claims which can reach £1,000 each which they consider to be an erosion of capital.
However, it is no secret that big banks are often found rejecting valid PPI claims, seeing over a million complaints escalate to the Financial Ombudsman to step in on behalf of the victim.
Despite the fact that the Financial Conduct Authority’s chief executive, Martin Wheatley, told MPs he remained sceptical about the prospect of a cut-off point, the British Bankers’ Association (BBA) has held initial talks with the City regulator regarding a cut-off for PPI claims.
The latest tentative steps taken towards a cut-off point have been faced with hostility from consumer groups, who were also keen to kill the prospect of any deal in the wake of previous attempts by the banks.
...